SARSCOV2 scenario
SARSCOV2 likely escaped from WIV by accident, explaining the Gov't misguided desperate measures Gov't over-reacted as unnatural source.
Also development possibly a Gain Of Function funded by USA & China.
Modelling by likes of Ferguson over exaggerated (had form).
Development of New Technology had previously been developed awaiting opportunity (Scientist jumped at chance to try them).
Traditional Vaccines generally Protein based, the New Tech mRNA & vvDNA were proposed as a quick 'solution'; but Gene Therapy based.
Phase 1,2 & 3 trials for these NT jabs ramped warp speed due to urgency of Gov'ts to find some sort of 'solution'.
Lockdowns likely did more harm than benefit, e.g. Sweden.
China hid data, non co-operation, stated Wet Market, possibly a smokescreen.
Many strains aka Variants were discovered but generally viruses weaken over time.
Face masks, social distancing, lockdown strategies became too onerous, draconian implementation taken too far by police.
Each country had different strategies, usually wrong in hindsight.
Meanwhile UK Govt not believing own rules broke them many times e.g. Ferguson, Cummings, Hancock, Johnson Parties...
Jabs developed needed 1 or 2, then boosters, protection claim was too high based on thin data.
Jabbed vs Unjabbed shows former having more issues, symptoms varied from unnoticeable through to death.
Ventilators used may've killed more than saved.
Respiratory disease not foaming, so surface cleaners un-affective, but still used.
As a Physicist working in engineering I was interested in this subject before I was considering to be jabbed.
I
was surprised at the lockdowns in the UK, and still considered it was a
knee jerk reaction with Boris under pressure to try to solve, but he
was advised by amonst others by Neil Ferguson, well known for
exaggerating issues & previously got other diseases estimates wildly
incorrect in severity & was reported as breaking his own advice,
then there was Cummings Barnard Castle eye test & also Hancock's
webcam shennanigans; plus all the parties by both main political groups;
these put to bed any notion that this was a severe flu as we were being
told by MSM esp BBC & ITV. I conjecture that the novel flu escaped
from the WIV & that was the main concern.
I was contacted numerous times by NHS text, NHS phone calls & personal persuasion,
but have deferred the decision as one expert agreed on Radio 4 people
can do, until this day. I have had the disease Covid19 once or twice and
for me it was merely a sore throat for 4 to 5 days, but I've had bad
true influenzas in the past that put me in bed for a week to a
fortnight, so maybe the immunity still exists from those.
To cut a long story short this is my current conclusion:
These Brand New Technology injections, are not true vaccines as I understand it.
The public were not told of the experimental nature of these 'vacccines'.
Pfizer & Moderna are mRNA.JnJ & A-Z are DNA + virus vectored (or vvDNA)
They all work by expressing spike protein in uncharacterised ways.
We don’t know how much, where or how long.
They are NOT traditional protein based jabs.
They
were pushed through phase trials 1, 2 & 3 at 'warp speed' before
knowing the long term effects (I remember Thalidamide in the news),
phase 3 & 4 trials are still ongoing.
Usually
traditional prophylactic protein vaccines take 10 to 15 years before
coming to market, however these were done in as few as months.
Traditional
Protein based jabs were considered around 40% to 70% effective, these
New Jabs were initially reportedly as better, but the original 90%+
figures from 'thin data' proved to be exaggerated. Some reports are they
are only effective for 3 months or so, so from needing 1 to 2 jabs they
now require boosters on top of the first couple of jabs & annually.
It was always said Colds & Flus cannot be sucessfully vaccinated
against in the traditional sense, but the New Tech Exp. jabs were being
developed waiting for such an opportunity. Needless to say big Pharma
had interests in funding such research. I've know some of the history of
vaccinations having been diagnosed diabetic since 2004, and used to
have annual protein jabs. However one expert told me that he always
declined it, doing his research found '...astonishingly, mass vaccination vs influenza doesn’t reduce hospitalisation or death, not at a macro level....
It’s as if it protects a few from flu but kills the same number. The data are absolutely unequivocal.
Also he said:
No
covid vaccine is needed and I’d leave well alone. Almost everyone with a
good immune system is fine with the virus & early treatments exist.
Those who ‘need’ a vaccine sadly have immune systems incapable of
responding either to the vaccines or the virus. The whole thing is a
fraud & lies...', he also said: 'All four Covid19 vaccines are very dangerous.'
Another
expert, the inventor of the mRNA platform, has recently quoted that
each jab causes 20 deaths per million, so 3 jabs would give 60 deaths
per million, this seems low but I believe previous vaccines have been
pulled off the market for lower figures. Not all deaths may've been
reported in the voluntary MHRA Yellow card scheme in UK, some estimate it represent 10% of actuality!
I
personally know of 11 people to die shortly after having them, maybe
coincidence but...., one a close colleague, it seems the booster can be
the worst. I know many now 12 who have injuries & affected their health in
bad ways.
Some experts who
previously silenced are speaking out about the dangers of these jabs.
See GBNews (app, you tube or Freeview 236 etc.) for the debates on
these.
There was also mixing of the 2 types in UK; quietly A-Z I beleive has been pulled from usage (TBC).
Even
though the Dalai Lama promoted their usage, having the A-Z one in India
& he is one of my teachers, I know he tries to align with Science
to give credence for his position within Buddhism & science of the
Mind; but for me he totally wrong to jump to the regarded so called
'consensus science' opinion of the day, especially if it's new
frontiers; science changes & is the least incorrect modelled
explanation of the world.
I'm
not trying to persuade anyone either way, and this is not my expert
field, but merely pointing out that a risk balance case needs doing for
each individual. I
know no 'unvaccinated' people are changing their mind & getting
jabbed however many people that initially got the jabs are refusing to
get more, maybe that means the unajbbed were right in being cautious all
along.
The above is confidential for your info only, not for publishing with my name attributed to it please...
I followed the growing story on vaccines as a Type 2
diabetic I knew about annual flu jabs which were traditional protein
based. What raised alarm bells for me was the coercion by the Government
and the NHS texting me & phoning me why I hadn't had them.
I
watched all news on-line & standard BBC/ITV + then 'your' great
channel came into existence and couldn't beleive they could make a
vaccine in approx. a year, I knew they had been looking previously at
such Gene Therapies & were waiting to try them out.
Then
hearing the Gov't said only over 70's I thought ok that's not me, but
then rolling them down to 50s then almost everyone. just seemed wrong
and too quick. Knowing that most traditional vaccines take 10 to 15
years to market.
OK, the trails were done, but at
rapid speed phase 1, 2 & 3 trails; 3&4 is still underway I
beleive & I recalled Thalidamide.
I
investigated further the 4 types being offered/coerced in UK and asked
diectly Dr Mike Yeadon for his view, who replied to me that:
'All four Covid19 vaccines are very dangerous.
Pfizer & Moderna are mRNA.
JnJ & A-Z are DNA + virus vectored.
Pfizer & Moderna are mRNA.
JnJ & A-Z are DNA + virus vectored.
They all work by expressing spike protein in uncharacterised ways. We don’t know how much, where or how long.'
Other
Drs were speaking out about the new jabs, but they were strangely being
cancelled, I know through 20+years of ClimateChange research that this
is a signal that we should listen to other opinions, & as a
scientist myself I know
always listen to people who disagree, they may save you making a fool of yourself & have views not considered.
Some
Drs beleive that those who've had the jabs will suffer some adverse
effect, maybe 2 to 5 years time an uptick in Heart problems &
Cancers. I personally know of 6 who have died from work contacts & a
close colleague in his 50's soon after such jabs! I hope it's not true
as my children both work in the NHS & despite my advice felt they
had no choice but to accept jabs.
I checked the NHS website for deaths FROM & WITH Covid 19, the former is still around the 5k
region & the latter in the 150k region. I don't believe it's a
conspiracy, as some do, to depopulate but more likely Fear, bad
modelling, Contracts, Big Pharma £$'s, Pride etc, and the need to find
an answer quickly as science was under the microscope so to speak.
So in conclusion I don't think anyone should be accepting these mRNA & vvDNA
New Technology Gene Based type Therapies for a influenza that has a
99.x% survivability rate, clearly Gov'ts were concerned as the SARSCOV2
virus possibly escaped from the WIV.
I don't expect you to read this all out, but as background info for you & researchers to keep this topic alive please.
Andrew Bridgend is a hero for me, we need answers to this mess.
My current view (sorry...a long read):
From months of debate & research since the start these are my current views, albeit like we all do top down conjectured but with more data than the average person because of my science interest:
Of course SARSCOV2 was a bad influenza, it was Novel after all, and maybe it was an accidental escape from the Wuhan Lab of Virology, which is probably why CCP hide all the evidence; but used the Wet Market as an excuse.
From months of debate & research since the start these are my current views, albeit like we all do top down conjectured but with more data than the average person because of my science interest:
Of course SARSCOV2 was a bad influenza, it was Novel after all, and maybe it was an accidental escape from the Wuhan Lab of Virology, which is probably why CCP hide all the evidence; but used the Wet Market as an excuse.
There is
possibility that it was engineering of a virus to either develop as a
bioweapon or research vaccines that escaped & was likely part funded
by USA.
Maybe but seems we'll never know for sure ...
Both
of the New Technology jabs that were designed were already under
development for at least a decade waiting for a use/outbreak, which is
how they could easily download to insert the DNA data, but they weren't
licensed (as some species reportedly died in trials) and were
& still are being authorised under Emergency measures only. The mRNA
in UK are Pfizer & Moderna and vvDNA is A-Z & JnJ both without
Long Term Data and not the traditional protein based vaccines but a new
gene (therapy) based for what turns our to be for a 99%+ survivable flu;
even with all the strains (or variants came to be the term). Most
viruses do deplete in severity as they promulgate. Many fear terms were used later such a "LongCovid" (but I had long flu previously wiped me out for months after them). Both work by expressing Spike Proteins in uncharacteristic ways, what we don't know how much, where or how long.
Some experts are concerned of future ramp up in cancers & heart
attacks (Sudden Deaths), already this has been noticed in sports fields;
possibly in UK 2k have died from the jabs compared to 5k have died of Covid19-ONLY
whereas WITH-Covid19 was 112k (need to update) - from NHS website:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/weekly-total-archive/
The
figures are lower than ONS & WorldOMeter. Even using the high
figures of 180k is still just a 0.27% fatality. Some are saying the
vaccines kept it low, no one really knows but it's a nice safe
narrative, but Sweden also has a lower rate without all the lock downs.
Vaccinations during pandemics are not the way to go some experts said,
they are prophylactics and not cures generally previous flu jabs I knew
were 40% to 70% efficacy (age is a factor) but the claims of 90%plus on
thin data was pharma marketing as now they are advising 2 then 3
(booster) & now 4 or 5 with at least annual jabs. Originally the
jabs were intended for over 70's & those with PEHC's only, but with
the scenario of deaths the Governments were under pressure to do
something as Prof. Neil Ferguson was predicting high deaths (6k a day
for Omicron!), but his models are always notoriously on the high side,
he was the one who in some newspapers reported who travelled across
London during the pandemic to hook up with his GF the Climate activist
Antonio Staats, then Cummings with his Barnard Castle notorious
'Eye-test' & later Hancock with his webcam 'snoggins' plus recent
revelations of Downing street parties just showed that those who set the
rules weren't convinced of them themselves!They kept calling
people like us the stupid lazy term "Anti-Vax" to close debate; much
like the nasty lazy term 'Deniers' of Climate debates; but I am pro-Vax,
but not having that NewTechnology ones until they are proved safe over a
longer period of time & the Risk/Balance case should be researched
before anyone succumbs to being part of a laboratory experiment IMHO.
Since
this whole saga I have changed my opinion on having even the
traditional annual flu jabs of recent. Some experts say each jab kills
own immune systems T cells hence making the jabbed more vulnerable.
The
scenario gained a frenzy of momentum added to by MSM & our
'pestering' phones, so much that Governments used coercion all the way
down the spectrum of ages, which are in no way needed. True many died
tragically, but this is the case with influenza; if you've ever had
previous a real bout of full on Influenza, not manflu, they 'floor you'
for week(s) which I personally had in 1980's & 90's. I started
having flu jabs as a T2 diabetic annually but as an expert a few months
ago messaged me that he always declined it, he did his research &
astonishingly, mass vaccination vs influenza doesn’t reduce
hospitalisation or death, not at a macro level. It’s as if it protects a
few from flu but kills the same number. The data are absolutely
unequivocal.
Most colleagues friends had these New Tech mRNA/vvDNA jabs so they can go on holiday & not for their health.
In
the end it's my view that it is personal choice along with your GP
whether to have any flu protein jab or these NT Gene ones, but
Governments didn't want their care systems overloaded as they were
already on the brink of collapse as they are inefficient organisations
which are trying to cure almost everything & such a burden on our
taxes/NI; when I visited our Father to Stoke there were so many staff
with many colours, seemingly very relaxed some just looking at their
phones, the only rush was when one old confused guy went into the
cleaning cupboard, and the nurses said did you see that!...From months of debate & research since the start these are my
current views, albeit we all do top down conjectured, but with more
research & data than the average person, because of my science
interest:
Of course SARSCOV2 was/is a bad influenza, it was Novel after all, and most likely an accidental escape from the Wuhan Lab of Virology, which is probably why CCP hid all the evidence; but used the Wuhan Wet Market as an excuse.
There is possibility that it was engineering of a virus to either develop as a bioweapon or research future vaccines, that escaped & was likely part funded by USA (Tony Fauci et al).
Both of the New Technology jabs that were designed were already under development for at least a decade waiting for a use/outbreak, which is how they could easily download to insert the DNA data when released from Chinese scientists (however some were re-educated for alerting World!), but they weren't licensed (as some species reportedly died in trials) and since roll out were & still are being authorised under Emergency Measures only. The mRNA type in UK are Pfizer & Moderna and vvDNA type is A-Z & JnJ both without Long Term Data, but now data from a year which is short term data for issues to transpire and are not the traditional protein based vaccines, but new gene (therapy) based ones for what turns our to be for a 99%+ survivable flu; even with all the strains (or variants came to be the term). Most viruses do deplete in severity as they promulgate, although some deny this & say they can get worse.
Many fear terms were used later such a "LongCovid" (but I had long flu previously wiped me out for months after them). Both work by expressing Spike Proteins in uncharacteristic ways, what we don't know how much, where or how long. Some experts are concerned of future ramp up in cancers & heart attacks (Sudden Adult/Infant Death Syndrome), already this has been noticed in sports fields; around 2k have died from the jabs compared to 5k have died of only Covid19 whereas WITH Covid19 is 112k - from NHS website.
A colleague (who said he was jabbed) mentions that many of Vaccine Injuries maybe due to whether or not syringe πis Aspirated before injection/>I still wouldn't agree to it at such an early stage.
The figures are lower than ONS & WorldOMeter. Even using the highest figures of 180k is still just a 0.27% fatality. Some are saying the vaccines kept deaths low, no one really knows but it's a nice safe narrative, but Sweden also has a lower rate without all the lock downs. Vaccinations during pandemics are not the method to use some experts warned, they are prophylactics and not cures. Generally previous traditional flu jabs I knew were 40% to 70% efficacy (age is a factor) but the claims of 90% plus efficacy based on thin data was pharma marketing ploy as now they are advising 2 then 3 (booster) & now 4 or 5 with at least annual jabs. Originally the jabs were intended for over 70's & those with PEHC's only, but with the scenario of deaths the Governments were under pressure to do something as Prof. Neil Ferguson was predicting high deaths (6k a day for Omicron), but his models are always notoriously on the high side, he was the one who travelled across London during the pandemic to hook up with his GF the Climate activist Antonio Staats, then Cummings with his Barnard Castle notorious 'Eye-test' & later Hancock with his webcam 'snoggins' plus recent revelations of Downing street parties just showed that those who set the rules weren't convinced of them themselves!
They kept calling people who questioned the NewJab push or Lockdowsn as the stupid lazy term "Anti-Vax" to close debate; much like the nasty lazy term 'Deniers' of Climate debates; but most appeared to be pro-Vax before this happened, but not having that NewTech ones until they are proved safe & the Risk/Balance case is positive for me; however I have changed my opinion on having even the traditional annual flu jabs.
The scenario gained a frenzy of momentum added to by MSM & our 'pestering' phones, so much that Governments used coercion all the way down the spectrum of ages, which are in no way needed. True many died tragically, but this is the case with other influenzas; if you've ever had previous ones they may've 'floor you' for week(s) which I had in 1980's & 90's. I started having flu jabs as a diabetic annually, but as an expert a few months ago messaged me that he always declined it, he did his research & astonishingly, mass vaccination versus influenza doesn’t reduce hospitalisation or death, not at a macro level. It’s as if it protects a few from flu but kills the same number. The data are absolutely unequivocal. Most colleagues friends had them so they can go on holiday & not for their health. Some have blamed deaths & side effects on the way the NewTech jabs are given, not being aspirated before injection through poor training of administerers of such.
Of course SARSCOV2 was/is a bad influenza, it was Novel after all, and most likely an accidental escape from the Wuhan Lab of Virology, which is probably why CCP hid all the evidence; but used the Wuhan Wet Market as an excuse.
There is possibility that it was engineering of a virus to either develop as a bioweapon or research future vaccines, that escaped & was likely part funded by USA (Tony Fauci et al).
Both of the New Technology jabs that were designed were already under development for at least a decade waiting for a use/outbreak, which is how they could easily download to insert the DNA data when released from Chinese scientists (however some were re-educated for alerting World!), but they weren't licensed (as some species reportedly died in trials) and since roll out were & still are being authorised under Emergency Measures only. The mRNA type in UK are Pfizer & Moderna and vvDNA type is A-Z & JnJ both without Long Term Data, but now data from a year which is short term data for issues to transpire and are not the traditional protein based vaccines, but new gene (therapy) based ones for what turns our to be for a 99%+ survivable flu; even with all the strains (or variants came to be the term). Most viruses do deplete in severity as they promulgate, although some deny this & say they can get worse.
Many fear terms were used later such a "LongCovid" (but I had long flu previously wiped me out for months after them). Both work by expressing Spike Proteins in uncharacteristic ways, what we don't know how much, where or how long. Some experts are concerned of future ramp up in cancers & heart attacks (Sudden Adult/Infant Death Syndrome), already this has been noticed in sports fields; around 2k have died from the jabs compared to 5k have died of only Covid19 whereas WITH Covid19 is 112k - from NHS website.
A colleague (who said he was jabbed) mentions that many of Vaccine Injuries maybe due to whether or not syringe πis Aspirated before injection/>I still wouldn't agree to it at such an early stage.
The figures are lower than ONS & WorldOMeter. Even using the highest figures of 180k is still just a 0.27% fatality. Some are saying the vaccines kept deaths low, no one really knows but it's a nice safe narrative, but Sweden also has a lower rate without all the lock downs. Vaccinations during pandemics are not the method to use some experts warned, they are prophylactics and not cures. Generally previous traditional flu jabs I knew were 40% to 70% efficacy (age is a factor) but the claims of 90% plus efficacy based on thin data was pharma marketing ploy as now they are advising 2 then 3 (booster) & now 4 or 5 with at least annual jabs. Originally the jabs were intended for over 70's & those with PEHC's only, but with the scenario of deaths the Governments were under pressure to do something as Prof. Neil Ferguson was predicting high deaths (6k a day for Omicron), but his models are always notoriously on the high side, he was the one who travelled across London during the pandemic to hook up with his GF the Climate activist Antonio Staats, then Cummings with his Barnard Castle notorious 'Eye-test' & later Hancock with his webcam 'snoggins' plus recent revelations of Downing street parties just showed that those who set the rules weren't convinced of them themselves!
They kept calling people who questioned the NewJab push or Lockdowsn as the stupid lazy term "Anti-Vax" to close debate; much like the nasty lazy term 'Deniers' of Climate debates; but most appeared to be pro-Vax before this happened, but not having that NewTech ones until they are proved safe & the Risk/Balance case is positive for me; however I have changed my opinion on having even the traditional annual flu jabs.
The scenario gained a frenzy of momentum added to by MSM & our 'pestering' phones, so much that Governments used coercion all the way down the spectrum of ages, which are in no way needed. True many died tragically, but this is the case with other influenzas; if you've ever had previous ones they may've 'floor you' for week(s) which I had in 1980's & 90's. I started having flu jabs as a diabetic annually, but as an expert a few months ago messaged me that he always declined it, he did his research & astonishingly, mass vaccination versus influenza doesn’t reduce hospitalisation or death, not at a macro level. It’s as if it protects a few from flu but kills the same number. The data are absolutely unequivocal. Most colleagues friends had them so they can go on holiday & not for their health. Some have blamed deaths & side effects on the way the NewTech jabs are given, not being aspirated before injection through poor training of administerers of such.
In the end it's my view that it is personal choice
along with your GP whether to have any flu protein jab or these NT Gene
ones, but Governments didn't want their care systems overloaded, as they
were already on the brink of collapse as they are inefficient
organisations which are trying to cure almost everything & such a
burden on our taxes/NI; when I visited our Father to Stoke there were so
many staff with many colours, seemingly very relaxed some just looking
at their phones, the only rush was when one old confused guy went into
the cleaning cupboard, and the nurses said did you see that!
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. Mike Yeadon
Barrington Declaration
https://members.vaxcontrolgroup.com/verify/LZF7UJPT4U5WXKXNAHRBKS
https://howbad.info/index.html
https://sleepyheadprogram.com/blog/can-we-recover-from-a-sleep-debt
https://ayjchan.medium.com/the-evidence-for-a-natural-vs-lab-origin-of-covid-19-6946407f3310
https://rumble.com/v1dl4lb-maajid-nawaz-interviews-pfizers-former-global-head-of-respiratory-diseases-.html
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/28/pfizer-vaccine-batches-in-the-eu-were-placebos-say-scientists/
https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-confirms-covid-shots-killed-17-million-people/
https://rumble.com/v4ap0mi-the-forest-of-the-fallen.html
Comments
Post a Comment